Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video1,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wearable Health Devices results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 813 hits. Analysis detected 5,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,824 of 16,562 topics). This Wearable Health Devices is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Wearable Health Devices
Topic details
Total words: 4,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.9% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.1%19.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.9%11.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos