Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wealth Tax Proposal results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 615 hits . Analysis detected 6,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,391 of 16,562 topics). This Wealth Tax Proposal is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Wealth Tax Proposal
Topic details
Total words: 2,190
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.6% percentile 9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 26.8% 26.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 26.7% 26.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 20.1% 20.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 23.3% 23.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 20.9% 20.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 2.5% Halo Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst