Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Water Protection results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 593 hits. Analysis detected 2,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,543 of 21,989 topics). This Water Protection is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Water Protection
Topic details
Total words: 2,740
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos