Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Water Policy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 3,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,937 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,266 of 16,562 topics). This Water Policy is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Water Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,937
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos