Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Watchos results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 662 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,402 of 16,473 topics). This Watchos is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Watchos
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 20.9%20.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 8.1%8.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.4%4.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos