Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wastewater Recycling results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,022 of 16,562 topics). This Wastewater Recycling is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Wastewater Recycling
Topic details
Total words: 2,684
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos