Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos9,607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War On Gaza results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 3,583 hits. Analysis detected 23,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,821 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,524 of 16,562 topics). This War On Gaza is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
War On Gaza
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 28,821
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles28.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos