Topic summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Funding results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,018 hits. Analysis detected 6,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,018 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,973 of 15,765 topics). This War Funding is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
War Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,018
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos