Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Crimes Investigations results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 488 hits. Analysis detected 3,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,582 of 16,562 topics). This War Crimes Investigations is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
War Crimes Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 1,833
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 21.9%21.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.6%26.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Horn Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos