Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War And Oppression results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 1,162 hits. Analysis detected 4,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,046 of 16,442 topics). This War And Oppression is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
War And Oppression
Topic details
Total words: 4,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.3% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.7%27.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos