Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War And Food results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 930 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,958 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,647 of 16,562 topics). This War And Food is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
War And Food
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,958
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos