Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wages And Income results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75.3% saturation with 610 hits. Analysis detected 3,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 810 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (258 of 16,562 topics). This Wages And Income is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Wages And Income
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 810
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510098.4% percentile
19.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles810 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 68.8%68.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 75.3%75.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 39.4%39.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 42.0%42.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 31.0%31.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 22.0%22.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 27.5%27.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 21.4%21.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 13.2%13.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Topic 75.3%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 68.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 42.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 39.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 31.0%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 27.5%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 21.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.2%Anecdotal: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos