Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wage And Hour Disputes results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (18,385 of 22,974 topics). This Wage And Hour Disputes is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Wage And Hour Disputes
Topic details
Total words: 1,832
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos