Topic summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vulnerability Disclosure results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 3,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,407 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,900 of 16,562 topics). This Vulnerability Disclosure is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Vulnerability Disclosure
Topic details
Total words: 4,407
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos