Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Voting Rights Legislation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 504 hits . Analysis detected 3,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Voting Rights Legislation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Voting Rights Legislation
Topic details
Total words: 3,300
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.0% Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst