Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voting Districts results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Status Quo Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 109 faulty-reasoning hits from 352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,855 of 16,562 topics). This Voting Districts is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Voting Districts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles352 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos