Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video1,062 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voter Suppression Tactics results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 919 hits. Analysis detected 7,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,003 of 23,278 topics). This Voter Suppression Tactics is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Voter Suppression Tactics
Topic details
Total words: 4,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 17.6%17.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.6%21.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Special Pleading: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos