Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Volunteer Recognition results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 738 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,715 topics). This Volunteer Recognition is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Volunteer Recognition
Topic details
Total words: 738
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles738 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos