Author summary
⁠4%2 analyzed articles/videos497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Recency Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 952 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,988 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (522 of 6,801 authors). This Lindsey is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Lindsey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠93%Lindsey (selected)8%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,988
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

92% percentile
025507510092.3% percentile
8.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 17.5%17.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.5%13.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.7%12.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Author 17.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos