Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Volleyball results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 2,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,001 of 16,562 topics). This Volleyball is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Volleyball
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos