Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Visa Policy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 980 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,730 of 16,562 topics). This Visa Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Visa Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos