Topic summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virtual Reality Training results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 1,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,482 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,053 of 16,562 topics). This Virtual Reality Training is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Virtual Reality Training
Topic details
Total words: 1,482
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.5% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 20.3% 20.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 16.5% 16.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 18.7% 18.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst