Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virgin Islands results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 1,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,871 of 16,562 topics). This Virgin Islands is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Virgin Islands
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos