Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Video Report results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 85.4% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 434 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (59 of 16,562 topics). This Video Report is worse (more manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Video Report
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 123
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

100% percentile
025507510099.6% percentile
32.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles123 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 85.4%85.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 85.4%85.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 56.9%56.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 48.0%48.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 28.5%28.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Topic 85.4%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 85.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 56.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 48.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos