Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Victor Wembanyama results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 1,318 hits. Analysis detected 6,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Victor Wembanyama is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Victor Wembanyama
Topic details
Total words: 4,948
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 26.6%26.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.1%25.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos