Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterinary Science results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 744 hits. Analysis detected 6,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,583 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,137 of 16,562 topics). This Veterinary Science is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Veterinary Science
Topic details
Total words: 6,583
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos