Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterans Issues results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 922 hits. Analysis detected 7,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,805 of 16,562 topics). This Veterans Issues is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Veterans Issues
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,680
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.0% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 14.4%14.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.1%25.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.5%14.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos