Topic summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 2,525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterans' Healthcare results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 1,793 hits . Analysis detected 11,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,575 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 64% (6,055 of 16,562 topics). This Veterans' Healthcare is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Veterans' Healthcare
Topic details
Total words: 7,575
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 23.7% 23.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst