Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Venture Capital Investments results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 914 hits. Analysis detected 7,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Venture Capital Investments is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Venture Capital Investments
Topic details
Total words: 5,504
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos