Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,000 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veiled Prophet results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 2,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,125 of 16,562 topics). This Veiled Prophet is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Veiled Prophet
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,000
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos