Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veganism results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 1,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,215 of 16,562 topics). This Veganism is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Veganism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,132
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 35.3%35.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.5%8.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 35.3%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos