Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Var In Football results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 1,217 hits. Analysis detected 7,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Var In Football is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Var In Football
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 37.0%37.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 37.0%37.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 18.7%18.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 37.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 37.0%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos