Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccine Safety results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 885 hits. Analysis detected 5,847 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,569 of 16,562 topics). This Vaccine Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Vaccine Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.6%24.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.1%11.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos