Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Vaccine Hesitancy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,378 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,778 topics). This Vaccine Hesitancy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Vaccine Hesitancy
Topic details
Total words: 8,378
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos