Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Vaccine Hesitancy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 471 hits . Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,378 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,778 topics). This Vaccine Hesitancy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Vaccine Hesitancy
Topic details
Total words: 8,378
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst