Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccine Debate results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Burden of Proof, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 3,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (7,471 of 23,351 topics). This Vaccine Debate is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Vaccine Debate
Topic details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 8.9%8.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos