Topic summary
3% 1 analyzed article/video 972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vacancy Tax results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 249 hits . Analysis detected 1,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,335 of 16,562 topics). This Vacancy Tax is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Vacancy Tax
Topic details
Total words: 3,888
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst