Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utility Companies results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 588 hits. Analysis detected 5,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,321 of 16,562 topics). This Utility Companies is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Utility Companies
Topic details
Total words: 4,344
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos