Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Utility Bill Assistance results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Utility Bill Assistance is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Utility Bill Assistance
Topic details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos