Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Transit Authority results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 593 hits. Analysis detected 3,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,270 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,935 of 16,562 topics). This Utah Transit Authority is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Utah Transit Authority
Topic details
Total words: 3,270
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.1%18.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos