Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Mammoth results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 2,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,731 of 16,562 topics). This Utah Mammoth is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Utah Mammoth
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,564
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 16.4%16.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.2%6.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos