Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Grizzlies Final Game results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 342 hits. Analysis detected 1,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,966 of 16,562 topics). This Utah Grizzlies Final Game is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Utah Grizzlies Final Game
Topic details
Total words: 3,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos