Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Football results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 67.8% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 3,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,194 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (479 of 16,562 topics). This Utah Football is worse (more manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
Utah Football
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,194
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510097.1% percentile
15.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 67.8%67.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 38.1%38.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 40.3%40.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 16.8%16.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.8%18.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.1%26.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Topic 67.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 40.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 38.1%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos