Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Venezuela Tensions results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 4,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,993 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,339 of 16,562 topics). This US Venezuela Tensions is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
US Venezuela Tensions
Topic details
Total words: 3,993
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.7%13.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos