Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These US Tariffs results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Recency Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 178 hits . Analysis detected 1,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,383 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,702 topics). This US Tariffs is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. US Tariffs
Topic details
Total words: 1,383
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.7% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Special Pleading: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst