Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Us Presidential Politics results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 948 hits. Analysis detected 3,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,575 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Us Presidential Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Us Presidential Politics
Topic details
Total words: 4,575
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.7%20.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos