Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These US Lebanon Relations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 1,877 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This US Lebanon Relations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
US Lebanon Relations
Topic details
Total words: 2,780
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.9%11.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos