Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Immigration Law results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,262 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,108 of 16,562 topics). This US Immigration Law is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
US Immigration Law
Topic details
Total words: 2,262
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos