Topic summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Federal Trade Commission results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 385 hits . Analysis detected 2,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ā 21% (13,092 of 16,562 topics). This Us Federal Trade Commission is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Us Federal Trade Commission
Topic details
Total words: 3,676
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst