Topic summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Dollar Strength results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 2,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,671 of 16,184 topics). This US Dollar Strength is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
US Dollar Strength
Topic details
Total words: 2,064
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos