Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Destinations results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,666 hits. Analysis detected 8,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,920 of 16,562 topics). This Us Destinations is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Us Destinations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos